The following was said by a friend of mine, but it might as well have come out of my own mouth:
…I’d say that, by and large, pretty much everything in my life is going according to plan, save for this delay in grad school, but nothing bad about that…
…and that I’ve worked to get the things I’ve wanted over the last few years and I’m rather content with where I am right now. The one thing that’s missing is, of course, the obvious. So I told myself I should do something to remedy my female-partner-deprived life over these next few months when I have some free time…
…but then I realized this isn’t a set of hot deals on computer components or a diploma…I can’t “work” on this.
And hell if I know where to even look in my current vicinity. Sadly I tell myself that I must wait, I cannot force anything out of nothing.
It just got me thinking. I told him that in some way, it’s a self-defeating attitude to have. You can wait and wait and wait; fate might work out your way, but it might not. Certainly if you were hoping to find someone where meeting them might come more naturally, such as during our four years of college, that had a slim chance of coming true; Cooper doesn’t exactly boast a wide and varied female population. But there was the possibility of the future. You were young enough to feel that you had your whole life ahead of you.
Now, though, when you make your way out into the world, the opportunities to meet people with little effort exerted become slimmer and slimmer. It’s up to you to create the opportunities. If you don’t do something about it, you might find yourself suddenly transported back to an eighth grade school dance, where you found yourself without a dancing partner as everyone started pairing off around you.
But it’s not time to worry just yet. There’s a trend towards getting married later in life, so there’s still hope–although I have a feeling that that doesn’t hold true back in the Midwest. And when you go off to grad school, there’s the chance that someone might just be impressed enough by your age and status as a grad student that she might say yes when you ask her out. From that point, though, it’s up to you to make something of it.
Me, I don’t worry, or at least I don’t worry yet.
I’ll tell you what I do think about, though. There’s a wall that I’ve built up–I can blame it on living in New York, but if you like, I’ll attribute it to other things–such that I’ve forgotten about love and its manifestations. Every so often, though, I’ll be reminded of something good about it; I’ll think of a moment that sums up the rewards of having someone that you care deeply about.
The most vivid image I have in my mind is of a time that I visited an old high school friend of mine, perhaps nine months ago. She was kind enough to host me in her dorm room (if I’m not mistaken, I’m still on her list-of-people-it’s-OK-to-give-keys-to), and though she was extremely busy with work and stayed up nights to finish it, she did come back to her room early in the morning to rest for a few hours.
I woke up one morning to find her in bed, asleep. The sun had risen and was gradually brightening up the small room, casting its golden rays over her as she slept. Bathed in that light, she was the apotheosis of an image of peace. I could not help but gaze upon her, feeling the need to watch over her, protect her. Alas, she was not mine to protect.
It’s the little things like that that remind me of what it was like to be intimately close with someone. And I miss that feeling.
Does religion have no place even in a pluralist society?
This country is based upon plurality–plurality of beliefs, of ideas, of heritages, of opinions. And yet, somehow, we manage to form a consensus regarding certain important topics. Humans have inherent inalienable rights. Pretty much everyone agrees on that.
Anything beyond that, and you get hotly debated issues wherein no progress is made toward consensus but you do get inflamed tensions, righteousness, and anger. Laws are enacted by our representative government that hopefully reflect the correct decision, or at the very least, the majority opinion; minority groups disagreeing with such laws tend to be vocal enough to seem that they speak for a majority; laws get overturned; and the cycle continues. People continue to argue to no end.
(I heard a joke about the Soviet concept of perestroika that went something like this: A visitor to the Soviet Union asked a man what perestroika was. The man took out two pails and some potatoes and started exchanging them back and forth between the pails. “Do you see anything changing?” asked the man. “No,” said the visitor. “Correct, but you hear the noise it makes.”)
Spinning our wheels…spinning our wheels.
This is, of course, a feature and not a bug in Democracy v2.1. We encourage many opinions, and we encourage the freedom to voice those opinions. With technology aiding the mass media, we are aware of the prevailing winds almost instantly. But when you’re trapped in the midst of the argument, it’s not unusual to feel as if something’s broken.
When there are a number of interests to be served, is not the correct action one of compromise? To be sure, each law on the books represents some sort of compromise–otherwise it would never have been ratified. That’s what happens when democracy is working.
But laws have been passed that lead me to believe that compromises were not sought. In some cases, it even seems that common sense has gone right out the window. This can’t be traced to any one person, since it takes many people to ratify a bill into law. I like to think that all of them couldn’t have had a simultaneous brain fart that made them lose their senses.
All this has served to shed some light on my own personal views, to which I realize I haven’t given much thought, but they exist nonetheless.
I get lopsided commentary on current events from the friends around me, who share some but not all of my political views and opinions. And it’s hard, because often times they will make a remark on some subject or issue and while I can understand where they’re coming from, I hear the multitude of voices echoing that remark as ridiculing my own beliefs.
I like to believe that some intelligent thought processes have informed my values and opinions. I also know that intelligent thought process have informed my friends’ values. I can’t subscribe to relativism, moral or otherwise, because that would ultimately deem my own values to be hypocritical. So what’s a guy to do?
Sometimes, it seems that my claim to follow Catholic teachings sets me apart from others. I become an anachronism, an unenlightened relic from another time. And because I let such teachings inform my point of view, I am unable to defend my opinions in even casual settings because not all the participants subscribe to the same axioms.
The odd part is that I think that everyone is motivated from the same core belief structure, that we all have an inherent idea of what is good and what is bad. Whether one takes the religious dogma route, or one free of such trappings, it seems that our conclusions ought to be the same. But then we get mired in the details, and all pretense to civility goes out the window.
If we would take some time to just see it from the other person’s point of view, if we could just suppress that reflex to instantly label the other person’s opinion as worthless, I think we would finally be able to get past this stage of merely spinning our wheels. ‘Cos, if you haven’t noticed, we’re kicking up a lot of mud and we’re just getting dirtier.